Posted Jun 28, 2006 at 08:13AM by Christopher C. Listed in: Accessories Tags: Photoshop, Sony, PS2, PSP Camera
Ó


PSP Camera



UPDATE 1: Having analysed the image in Photoshop since reading the comments below, I still think the inscription reads 1.3MP. As far as pricing goes, my statements on the $50 price point were merely conjecture (as should be apparent in the article). We'll be contacting Sony for clarification on both issues shortly. Thanks for being vigilant guys!


I've also since been informed by people in the know that a 1.3MP camera could in fact be capable of simple facial recognition.


The PSP camera is one elusive little gal, she's often hidden in shadows and known to move so fast it's almost impossible to get a clear shot of her, but we've managed to track one down. As you can see from the inscription on the device it's likely it'll be a 1.3 mega pixel camera, and it's pretty teeny too. The camera resolution suggests that you won't be taking snapshots and printing them out at huge sizes for friends and family, but it should work well enough with the PSP's relatively low screen resolution. Now that we've actually got a good look at the device we've got to wonder just what sort of gameplay functionality, if any the device will have. Unlike the PS2 Eye Toy we won't be able to move about in front of this camera, and since our fingers will be busy pushing buttons that leaves only our faces, and it's unlikely that a 1.3 mega pixel camera has the sensitivity to pick up subtle facial expressions. Whether or not this confines the camera to video conferencing and multimedia applications is anyones guess, as is the price on this baby, but it's unlikely to cost more than $50, especially when you consider the Eye Toy + 1 game bundle costs about that much.

So what do you guys think, will gamers snap it up, or leave this peripheral in the dust?


[Via IT Media] Permalink  |   Email this  |   Linking Blogs   |   Digg It!

Bookmark / Find this article on:


123 Comments


Sort by:
   by mbslrm - 2006-06-28
 » ...

Amazing....

   by TheBoyEclectic (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » Multimedia Potential

I agree that it may not have much to offer as far as gameplay input. However, the ability to take Web-friendly photos and short video clips makes it a nifty item. Especially if it is capable of videoconferencing. Sadly, most of this functionality is going to require a newer firmware, so my 1.5 and I will patiently wait for a motivated homebrew coder who wants to port Skype to the PSP!

   by xsorifc28 (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » small

very small and nice. though i dont think i want one.

   by p-J (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » DIY

Just wait a couple of weeks and there will be someone who made a DIY webcam, its doesnt seem that hard to me?

   by Pagnell (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » One word.

Pointless.

   by . (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » ewww?

1.3 mega pixel
helllll no

   by bob (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » what?

1.3 megapixles..... thats *****e! my phone has a better camera than that - who is going to bother paying for somthinng that most mobile phones have built into them for free? sony mess up once again ho hum

   by . (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » Cheap...

Looks cheap to me. Silver paint on plastic? If I get it, it'll be only for the motion JPEG video conferencing.

   by Advertising -
   by Noin (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » listen sony u *****s

The PSP hackers owned you understood?? you can put those sorry excuses for us to upgrade to 3.0 or whatever ***** version u make in your ASS! you messed with the PSP users too much, thought you control everything - but in reality you don't control *****. Sony you lost, no matter how many things u patch, or how many people you hire - you will NEVER WIN, so just stop it already because you only bring losses to yourself.

   by Adam (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » *****.

Why pay for this when my sexy W810i has a 2.0 megapixel camera built in? I just dont understand the logic of Sony sometimes.....stupid nubs.

   by CoolRaccoon (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » step forward....

Its a step forward........ Soon after, Logitech (and people like that) will relese something much better!

   by w (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » crap

this camera is crap 1.3 mega pixel same as cell phones, theres cameras that cost about the same as this that have much higher mega pixel. sony should at least make this 3.0 mega pixel because you cant see crap with 1.3 meag pixels.

   by Kos (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » lmao at u noobs

it says its likely as in this is speculation what the resolution is...noone can say ***** till its released so why dont u lot shut up and wait

   by listen (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » More features require

will this be able to do video call or something like that

   by lk (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » That thing suck

Why would I get that when my Korean imported cell phone have 10 megaxiels resolution.

   by Bildo (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » I dig it

And will be getting one :->

   by Alok (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » no need for a video camera

I don't care about video conferencing...unless that one company does hook us up with psp phone..that might be cool.

But anyway, Im way more interested in what they can do with games. I'm kind of confounded as to how the psp will use this in games. The original eyetoy was pretty cool with games. And it seems like they could do all sorts of things in the next gen if sony would put a few more resources into it. But I don't get what you can do if it's all about facial expression and probably swaying your neck around. They didn't really offer up much in their interview with ign. There was that one pic of the girl using her head to help bridge the way for some lemmings, but that's not too exciting.

   by Advertising -
   by me (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » looky here

how can you say 1.3 mp is bad most fone people advertise "1.3 MP!" and are hyped when japanese fones already have 8-9 MP. In america 1.3 is big in ever where else around the world with third gen technology its crap but i think we're all frum america

   by Shrink (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » Oh boy

My god. I don't think they will "improve" it with more pixels. Shown is shown is thrown (on the market).
I'm really disappointed this time. I thought I could get a real multimedia device. Now this is a piece of sh*t.
1.3 MP that is really low. Even for the "low" resulution of the PSP screen. If it's really that bad I won't buy it.

   by me (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » looky here

how can you say 1.3 mp is bad most fone people advertise "1.3 MP!" and are hyped when japanese fones already have 8-9 MP. In america 1.3 is big in ever where else around the world with third gen technology its crap but i think we're all frum america

   by ignoramus (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » want a cookie?

wow. your electronic leash that big brother has provided to u to keep track of you at all times has a better camera built-in with a higher mega-pixel count...AND it was imported from korea...big *****in' deal. u feel special? congratulations numbnuts.

   by w (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » to #13

why you laughing at the so called noob when your actually a noob. this camera is the prtotype of the real camera thats going to come out later this year, you know what it say on the camera it says 1.3 mega pixel so why would sony change it to a higher mega pixel when there trying to make a 1.3 mega pixel camera.

   by Vipre77 - 2006-06-28
 » 1.3MP isn't that horrible, guys

1280x1024 resolution is what 1.3MP translates to. Strictly looking at the resolution, that's good enough for a desktop wallpaper on most people's computer screens. The quality of that 1280x1024 image is another story altogether. What do you expect for $50? You're not going to be a professional photographer with such a piece of equipment. And, no, there is no phone on the market in the US that beats that kind of resolution for $50. It's only $50 because you have to sign a minimum one year phone plan unless you're on a pay-as-you-go plan, but then you don't get the big discount on the phone. Either way, you're paying a lot more for that phone than $50. Cell phone companies often lose money on the phone itself and make it up in airtime, accessory, and other add-on sales. It works just like the video game console biz.

   by Jx1 - 2006-06-28
 » i think it's cool

nice addition, mostly for small video feeds and clips to store, but not for photography.
I'm not all that dissapointed with this, not sure why everybody starts hating on sony for stuff like this. Look for the uses before criticizing.

j-

   by FLai - 2006-06-28
 » .

gamers will snap it up if it doesn't need a firmware upgrade

   by mylastresort77 - 2006-06-28
 » ook

im gonna wait and see if there are any third party cameras developed

   by Shrink (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » What?

1.3 MP good? Hell I had a 1.3 MP Cam in a Siemens Phone. That was sh'tty. I mean really sh'tty. I don't think it makes great pictures to use as wallpapers. Btw you would have to resize them (zoom in means a loss of quality) because I don't think they make this cam a 16:9 cam. That would be really ridiculous.
I got a Sony K750i it has a 2.0 MP cam with auto-focus. This is acceptable quality for a cell phone. But hey, the PSP is 20 times bigger with much more possibilities and a better chipset. So 3-5 MP shouldn't really be the problem.

Just think about how many people would buy a PSP to have a digital camera AND a gaming-device. So what the hell do those people at Sony think they do? They lose a giant market. No new PSP customers because of this.

   by Advertising -
   by PSPPPPPP (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » Cool

That looks nice,but i have a Benq 8.2 megapixel,bought it for just 95$

   by TheProfessor - 2006-06-28
 » I thougth it was already being used for games

I saw an IGN article a while back where they play with some demos with the psp eyetoy at E3. They thought it wasn't very sensitive but later claimed it was because of the low right at E3.

This will definitely be used for gaming. I wouldn't be surprise if it also came bundled with a mini game compilation.

   by luis (Unregistered) - 2006-06-28
 » u got 2 be kidding me.

this is the gayest thing sony did i mean come on.that camera 1.3 is the suckeist thing in the world. sony lost the battle to nintendo and should just give up soooooooooo
up yours sony!!!!!!
lets leave this peripheral in the dust.



Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!

 Username: 
 Password:
Forgot password
New user registration



Categories
Emulators
Titles
Archives