Posted Dec 03, 2008 at 01:04PM by Gino D.
Listed in:
Homebrew Emulators,
Amiga 500
Tags:
Amiga,
PSPUAE
Ó
|
PSP developer FOL has released a new version of Amiga homebrew emulator PSPUAE. This release adds FAME/C functionality - that's just about it. Full changelog for PSPUAE v0.72 FAME/C Edition is as follows:
Im only releasing this, because people wanted it. Be warned its unstable and can guru alot. That said, it is faster. Also old SAVESTATES are NOT compatible with this release. Also, to get this to work with 1.50 you will have to convert the eboot yourself. Please do not post regarding crashing issues with this release, as I have already pointed out its flaws. Unless someone wants to improve the FAME/C CPU core, im done with it. Of course, a readme is meant to be read. Make sure that you do. Download: PSPUAE v0.72 FAME/C Edition Related articles: |
|
|
[Via PSPUAE]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
13 Jumps
Custom firmware 5.50GEN-D now out
12 Jumps
PSP homebrew - Easy3Dcpp v0.1
17 Comments
|
 |
by Advertising - |
|
 
|
|
by blackthorn - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» Hmmm
I love the PSP EMUs and the Amiga one is one that hasn't been fully converted to run 100% yet...
Extra functionality is always welcome, but not at the expense of stability.
I'll give it a try...
I love the PSP EMUs and the Amiga one is one that hasn't been fully converted to run 100% yet...
Extra functionality is always welcome, but not at the expense of stability.
I'll give it a try...
|
Re: FOL - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» Fame C
Hence, why I avoided FAME/C. It may be faster but its very unstable. As far as I know the famec cpu source isnt going to be updated.
Hence, why I avoided FAME/C. It may be faster but its very unstable. As far as I know the famec cpu source isnt going to be updated.
|
by raggedjimmi - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» -
Once there's a fullspeed (with sound) Amiga emulator I'll probably delete everything else off my Memory Stick Pro Duo Alpha Ex Upper and sell all my UMDs. There will really be no need for anything else.
Until then, I cry.
Once there's a fullspeed (with sound) Amiga emulator I'll probably delete everything else off my Memory Stick Pro Duo Alpha Ex Upper and sell all my UMDs. There will really be no need for anything else.
Until then, I cry.
|
Re: FOL - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» FullSpeed
I concur. I only use my PSP now for PSPUAE. I to want fullspeed and thats why I keep messing with PSPUAE, to gain more and more speed.
People will proberly disagree, but I think PSPUAE FAME C is faster than UAE4ALL. Simply cause pspuae is compiled on the old toolchain. New toolchain loses alot of speed.
I concur. I only use my PSP now for PSPUAE. I to want fullspeed and thats why I keep messing with PSPUAE, to gain more and more speed.
People will proberly disagree, but I think PSPUAE FAME C is faster than UAE4ALL. Simply cause pspuae is compiled on the old toolchain. New toolchain loses alot of speed.
|
by Hungry Horace - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» always the same on QJ.net
Seriously... it's no wonder FOL refuses to post news of his developments on this site. It's the same story everytime.... nothing but ungrateful complaints.
Did you guys even bother to read the post? there's no "extra functionality" with this release... it is a PURE SPEED UPDATE to keep moaners like you lot happy. I really dont think any of you appreciate the hard work that goes into improving the emulator. Yes, some stability has gone, but that only makes it as unstable as UAE4ALL, since this version now uses the same CPU core.
There were a lot less complaints when UAE4ALL was released than there always are with PSPUAE, yet PSPUAE continues to get updated time and time again for you lot.
Personally, i will stick with the slower and more compatible version, because as an Amiga user I seem to be able to make this thing work for me better than most PSP-users seem to manage. god knows why, since we're all using the same emulator, and i certainly dont find cause to moan like so many others.
Seriously... it's no wonder FOL refuses to post news of his developments on this site. It's the same story everytime.... nothing but ungrateful complaints.
Did you guys even bother to read the post? there's no "extra functionality" with this release... it is a PURE SPEED UPDATE to keep moaners like you lot happy. I really dont think any of you appreciate the hard work that goes into improving the emulator. Yes, some stability has gone, but that only makes it as unstable as UAE4ALL, since this version now uses the same CPU core.
There were a lot less complaints when UAE4ALL was released than there always are with PSPUAE, yet PSPUAE continues to get updated time and time again for you lot.
Personally, i will stick with the slower and more compatible version, because as an Amiga user I seem to be able to make this thing work for me better than most PSP-users seem to manage. god knows why, since we're all using the same emulator, and i certainly dont find cause to moan like so many others.
|
Re: blackthorn - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» Oh ffs
Will you stfu and stop sucking the dev's *****?
No one said it was bad, we're just looking for improvements in code is all.
Fact is, there's other, more complex platforms out there that have already been converted successfully and have close to full speed and stability on the PSP.
Yet some of the (arguably) better ones like Amiga and MAME still are struggling...
It's not that anyone here is ungrateful you presumptive *****stickle, but rather that we're all hoping and waiting to see our favourite platforms get to that level of gaming perfection we're all hoping to see.
And if you start babbling ***** about 'go do it yourself then' you can go ***** yourself.
Will you stfu and stop sucking the dev's *****?
No one said it was bad, we're just looking for improvements in code is all.
Fact is, there's other, more complex platforms out there that have already been converted successfully and have close to full speed and stability on the PSP.
Yet some of the (arguably) better ones like Amiga and MAME still are struggling...
It's not that anyone here is ungrateful you presumptive *****stickle, but rather that we're all hoping and waiting to see our favourite platforms get to that level of gaming perfection we're all hoping to see.
And if you start babbling ***** about 'go do it yourself then' you can go ***** yourself.
|
Re: Hungry Horace - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» @ Blackthorn
wow, what a brilliantly inept answer. reduced to childish swearing and name-calling.
I happen to be actively aiding the developers myself, and am on the PSPUAE team , so no-offence if i consider myself considerably better-informed on the matter than you. There's no "sucking" here, i happen to give them a lot of bad news during the development process - they dont always like it, but they know why i do it.
The only "more complex platform" which has a faster emulator is the PS1, somewhat aided by the fact it's Sony developed, with documented info about all the function-calls and instructions. There is NO harder system than the Amiga to emulate, due to the large number of custom chips on the chipset. SNES, MegaDrive and other similar platforms do not have this kind of chipset to emulate.
Yes, we all want to see this emulator at full speed on everything, but comments such as your DO show a lack of understanding and a failure to appricate the difficulty of this task involved. The fact is, that used correctly and with a degree of intelligence this version especially can run quite a few games fullspeed.
wow, what a brilliantly inept answer. reduced to childish swearing and name-calling.
I happen to be actively aiding the developers myself, and am on the PSPUAE team , so no-offence if i consider myself considerably better-informed on the matter than you. There's no "sucking" here, i happen to give them a lot of bad news during the development process - they dont always like it, but they know why i do it.
The only "more complex platform" which has a faster emulator is the PS1, somewhat aided by the fact it's Sony developed, with documented info about all the function-calls and instructions. There is NO harder system than the Amiga to emulate, due to the large number of custom chips on the chipset. SNES, MegaDrive and other similar platforms do not have this kind of chipset to emulate.
Yes, we all want to see this emulator at full speed on everything, but comments such as your DO show a lack of understanding and a failure to appricate the difficulty of this task involved. The fact is, that used correctly and with a degree of intelligence this version especially can run quite a few games fullspeed.
|
Re: FOL - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» blackthorn
I think horace misunderstood your post as being ungreatful.
I didnt see it as such, I came to the conclusion that, you were comparing it with PSP UAE4ALL which has no options / features.
I think horace misunderstood your post as being ungreatful.
I didnt see it as such, I came to the conclusion that, you were comparing it with PSP UAE4ALL which has no options / features.
|
Re: Hungry Horace - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» re: the comments
no, i didnt misunderstand it, clearly FOL, you want to be cautiously polite. I cant see that the comparison could have been with UAE4ALL, because to call that full-speed (or anywhere near stable) would be far from correct.
Lets se... the began with a rather dubious "hmm" and continued;
"The Amiga one is one that hasn't been fully converted to run 100% yet"
hasnt been fully converted? I think this shows a complete lack of understanding of what goes into creating an emulator, especially one for a system this complex.
t doesnt help that the O.P. referred to the FAME/C core as 'functionality' which is equally inaccurate.
"more complex platforms out there that have already been converted successfully and have close to full speed and stability on the PSP" continues to show further failure of understanding. For one thing, the non-FAME/c PSPUAE 0.72 is incredibly stable (does that count as 'run 100%', since i've yet to find any OCS/ECS game that wont work on at least one setting) and that version too is able to run certain programs at full speed.
I also wont be threatened by pathetic name-calling by people who cant be bothered (or are able to) form a coherent argument.
no, i didnt misunderstand it, clearly FOL, you want to be cautiously polite. I cant see that the comparison could have been with UAE4ALL, because to call that full-speed (or anywhere near stable) would be far from correct.
Lets se... the began with a rather dubious "hmm" and continued;
"The Amiga one is one that hasn't been fully converted to run 100% yet"
hasnt been fully converted? I think this shows a complete lack of understanding of what goes into creating an emulator, especially one for a system this complex.
t doesnt help that the O.P. referred to the FAME/C core as 'functionality' which is equally inaccurate.
"more complex platforms out there that have already been converted successfully and have close to full speed and stability on the PSP" continues to show further failure of understanding. For one thing, the non-FAME/c PSPUAE 0.72 is incredibly stable (does that count as 'run 100%', since i've yet to find any OCS/ECS game that wont work on at least one setting) and that version too is able to run certain programs at full speed.
I also wont be threatened by pathetic name-calling by people who cant be bothered (or are able to) form a coherent argument.
|
by gohan - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» wat
wat is the emulator for like wat is it is it a game console or coputer
wat is the emulator for like wat is it is it a game console or coputer
|
Re: FOL - 2008-12-03 |
|
|
» It is
Its an emulator for the greatest home computer ever made.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga
Its an emulator for the greatest home computer ever made.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga
|
by _MK2k_ - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» .
Nice one FOL, it's great to see you (and the team?) still working on PSPUAE and bringing out releases. I hope you're all well
-- MK2k
Nice one FOL, it's great to see you (and the team?) still working on PSPUAE and bringing out releases. I hope you're all well
-- MK2k
|
by raggedjimmi - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» -
Just giving it a try now with Turrican 2. Awesome work on the eboot sound and graphic though :D don't know if I prefer this or the Lotus 3 one.
and how mad. no display at all! Just the Amiga numbers and such in the corner.
Just giving it a try now with Turrican 2. Awesome work on the eboot sound and graphic though :D don't know if I prefer this or the Lotus 3 one.
and how mad. no display at all! Just the Amiga numbers and such in the corner.
|
Re: raggedjimmi - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» -
Fixed after some tweaking. fantastic performance boost FOL. Keep it up! This is really great. Still a bit choppy and makes it unplayable but overall better than the other UAE.
Fixed after some tweaking. fantastic performance boost FOL. Keep it up! This is really great. Still a bit choppy and makes it unplayable but overall better than the other UAE.
|
Re: FOL - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» Hi
Well, FAME C is not being updated. So thats all that can be done with it. Im hoping to go back to standard cpu core and use the ME (PSP CPU) for the sound.
Not sure when I will get time for that at the moment. I was hoping to get something out before Christmas, with improved sound.
Well, FAME C is not being updated. So thats all that can be done with it. Im hoping to go back to standard cpu core and use the ME (PSP CPU) for the sound.
Not sure when I will get time for that at the moment. I was hoping to get something out before Christmas, with improved sound.
|
Re: raggedjimmi - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» -
That's good news! Turrican 1 and 2 and YoJoe both play but they get hit by slowdown during heavy moments. Especially when you use Turricans surround attack.
Now I've finally got hope that I'll be able to finally play Amiga games on my Amiga :)
That's good news! Turrican 1 and 2 and YoJoe both play but they get hit by slowdown during heavy moments. Especially when you use Turricans surround attack.
Now I've finally got hope that I'll be able to finally play Amiga games on my Amiga :)
|
Re: FOL - 2008-12-04 |
|
|
» Hi
Lower the CPU speed, the onscreen slowdown is normal. As the higher the cpu, the slower the chipset.
Lower the CPU speed, the onscreen slowdown is normal. As the higher the cpu, the slower the chipset.
Contact Us:
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - November
| Most Commented | |
| (103) | |
| (66) | |
| (48) | |
| (35) | |
| (34) | |
| (33) | |
| (29) | |
| (27) | |
| (24) | |
| (22) | |
| (21) | |
| (18) | |
| (18) | |
| (17) | |
| (13) | |
| (13) | |
| (13) | |
| (13) | |
| (13) | |
| (12) | |
User Favorites - November
Accessories
(615)Add-ons
(87)Applications
(176)Artwork
(81)Batteries
(18)Cheats
(63)Deals
(264)Events
(160)Firmware
(338)Flash Applications
(20)Flash games
(33)Game Demos
(34)Games
(5875)Hacks & Exploits
(441)Homebrew Applications
(4693)Homebrew Demos
(73)Homebrew Development
(891)Homebrew Emulators
(1171)Homebrew Games
(2405)Homebrew Themes
(18)How-To
(222)Humor
(51)Imports
(231)Interviews
(628)Magazines
(310)Mods
(211)MY QJ
(14)News
(7605)Off Topic
(603)On Shelves This Week
(30)Opinions & Analysis
(478)Podcasts
(25)Previews
(1669)PSP Go
(86)PSP Minis
(7)PSP Slim & Lite
(124)QJ How-To Series
(11)QuickJump QuickGuide
(18)QuickJump QuickPeek
(36)Reviews
(114)Rumors
(490)Scans
(170)Screenshots
(701)Site News
(174)UMD Movies
(180)Videos
(1726)Weekend Warrior
(71)Wi-Fi
(203)
Emulators
Amiga 500
(29)Amstrad CPC
(28)Apple II
(1)Atari
(64)BBC Micro computer
(8)Capcom Play System 1
(36)Capcom Play System 2
(42)Chip 8
(9)ColecoVision
(21)Commodore 64
(20)DosBox
(11)Gameboy & Gameboy Color
(91)Gameboy Advance
(64)HitBit
(8)HP48
(9)Intellivision
(9)J2ME
(3)Macintosh
(9)MAME
(23)MGT Sam Coupé
(7)MSX
(52)Neo Geo
(116)Nintendo 64
(127)Nintendo NES
(60)Odyssey
(1)PC-8801
(6)PC-9801
(7)PlayStation
(26)PSP
(44)ScummVM
(21)Sega Gamegear & Master System
(37)Sega Genesis Megadrive
(52)Super Nintendo SNES
(87)Tandy Color Computer/ Dragon
(1)Thomson MO5
(4)Thomson T07-70
(8)TI-92
(7)TI-99
(3)Turbo Grafx 16 & PC Engine
(54)Vectrex
(4)Virtual Boy
(0)Wonderswan
(30)X86
(1)ZX Spectrum
(10)ZX81 Sinclair
(7)
Titles
Archives
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
