Posted Sep 23, 2006 at 06:42AM by Mabie A.
Listed in:
Previews,
Games,
WWE Smackdown Vs Raw 2007
Tags:
THQ
Ó
|
Pre-Order: [WWE Smackdown vs. Raw 2007 (Xbox 360)] Pre-Order: [WWE Smackdown vs. Raw 2007 (PSP)] |
|
|
[Via IGN]
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
21 Jumps
PSP Homebrew - G-stion'R V3
8 Jumps
Recovery Flasher v1.32
17 Comments
|
 |
by kersplatty - 2006-09-23 |
|
 
|
neva rly liked wrestling but the games are always fun. lol im 1st
|
by ***** (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» *****
*****
*****
|
by Ryan (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» MAN I CAN'T WAIT ANYMORE
I really wanna play this game already.
I really wanna play this game already.
|
by DtotheK (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» mm
again with the XBOX360 pics to show off a PSP game.. and the Pre order option once again present. i might be impressed with the game...when i see PSP screenshots... - unimpressed once again with PSP updates
again with the XBOX360 pics to show off a PSP game.. and the Pre order option once again present. i might be impressed with the game...when i see PSP screenshots... - unimpressed once again with PSP updates
|
by saibot (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» Screens
X360 screens? PSP version isn't going to look that beautiful:D...
X360 screens? PSP version isn't going to look that beautiful:D...
|
by SilentHill (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» hmm wt
why do the models have a blurr effect outline.. is that some cheap way to hide the jaggy edges ?
this game better not screw up the smackdown series ps2 had exclusives or.. i mean look at xbox raw and raw 2.. that ***** sucked (had no gameplay) and then you look at ps2's smackdown series and it was all there
why do the models have a blurr effect outline.. is that some cheap way to hide the jaggy edges ?
this game better not screw up the smackdown series ps2 had exclusives or.. i mean look at xbox raw and raw 2.. that ***** sucked (had no gameplay) and then you look at ps2's smackdown series and it was all there
|
by soemguy (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» im not sure
here i went to gamespot to see their psp screenshots of the game
http://www.gamespot.com/psp/action/smackdownvsraw2007/screenindex.html
i think they r xbox 360 screens tho
here i went to gamespot to see their psp screenshots of the game
http://www.gamespot.com/psp/action/smackdownvsraw2007/screenindex.html
i think they r xbox 360 screens tho
|
by DtotheK (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» mm
yeah there xbox xcreenshots on gamespot alright.. they do look impressive but it's just a pity they don't have actual PSP screens
yeah there xbox xcreenshots on gamespot alright.. they do look impressive but it's just a pity they don't have actual PSP screens
|
by Advertising - |
|
|
|
by Uhmm... (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» Yeah...
I've already seen the PSP screens....in terms of graphics they look pretty much just like SvR '06......
And you guys here at PSPUpdates really need to check what the **** you type..........SERIOUSLY!
You're giving false information!
Well not false because it is true......but for the XBOX 360!
Online mode still hasn't been announced for the PSP if at all! And then adding the 360 screens..............nice.....
You guys basically just copied and pasted your 360 post to the PSP section....
Morons!
Seriously!
The games features on the 360 are much different than the PSP features.......go read about it at IGN or something you guys are really moronic to post that here....
I've already seen the PSP screens....in terms of graphics they look pretty much just like SvR '06......
And you guys here at PSPUpdates really need to check what the **** you type..........SERIOUSLY!
You're giving false information!
Well not false because it is true......but for the XBOX 360!
Online mode still hasn't been announced for the PSP if at all! And then adding the 360 screens..............nice.....
You guys basically just copied and pasted your 360 post to the PSP section....
Morons!
Seriously!
The games features on the 360 are much different than the PSP features.......go read about it at IGN or something you guys are really moronic to post that here....
|
by Mentality - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
I just hope it isn't as slow as the last one personally, the last one was just ridiculous.
|
by ayyyay (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» tee
WORST
GRAPHICS
EVER!!!!!!!!
GO SUCK A MEXICAN'S DONG!!!!!!
WORST
GRAPHICS
EVER!!!!!!!!
GO SUCK A MEXICAN'S DONG!!!!!!
|
by ah (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» Sony Leak
im just clearing things up which people seem no to understand that sony is again overhyping, but this time theyve done well to hide it.and its just a matter of time before it gets released.
First a bit on my background.
I have done an education for computer sciences with a major in 3D graphics development, and I am now working for my PhD.
Since this is so, I have worked quite a bit with hardware in terms of programming and graphics creation
Let me warn all of you, sony is overhyping it's product once again, like they have done before.
And I am amazed to see how biased several of the webpages and magazines are.
They all try to downsize Xeon and Xenon technology, but with the arguments and testcases that most of these sources come up with , Cell and RSX will often come out way worse, yet that's a thing they do not show us of course.
Many people don't seem to grasp that ATI's Xenon truly is a revolution in terms of pipeline architecture.
Unlike the RSX the Xenon is truly next gen,
Xenon revolutionizes powermanagement within it's core, so it doesn't need all the mhz's to create a massive output.
The unified shader architecture also gives developers way more playground, and the Xbox 360 will certainly be able to incorperate more ways of instruction for creating and rendering the graphics on screen.
The RSX on the other hand will have it's massive clockspeed, but it will use it in a less efficient way.
Anyway, with the specs of both consoles now fully released it is possible to do a REAL TIME comparinson of the 2 consoles,your about to see what most of the sony representetives didnt want you to see.
Comparing these two GPU's is like comparing Apples to Banana's.
RSX on paper will have certain advantages over Xenon, and Xenon will have certain advantages over RSX.
There is the element of co-operation with the CPU we also have to consider.
Ok, lets put up the specs for the RSX as published.
- 550 Mhz
- 51 billion dot products/sec count's for total system performance
- 300 Million Transistors
- 136 shader operations per clock
good now that's for the facts as presented to us, we have 550 MHz of power to work with
The Cell and the RSX together are capable to produce 51 billion dot products.
I think it is interesting to take a closer look at this claim especially, since I worked with this bit while the specs of both consoles first became public, the important thing is that mnay people just compare the seperate peices of each console to PS fanboys and PS3 no-it-alls it will be music to there ears, but to us who know about comoputers and know how to compare them,ill tell you one thing, sony has lost alot of its credibility ;).
Anyway.
Since the Cell will have 7 DSP's all being able to do a dot product per cycle, we have some numbers to work with, we can put the numbers in a small calculation.
7DSP * 3.2(ghz) = 22.4 billion dot products/sec for the CPU
since we had 51 billion in total , we will have to substract them to know what is left for the GPU.
51 - 22.4 = 28.6 Billion dot products
When you devide this number to the clockspeed of the GPU you will get 52 ALU operations per clock as they are called.
Now as stated before, the RSX's architecture is not that different from the GeForce 6800 and so it will use Vector4 standards.
Since ATI's architecture is done with Vector5s it will handle the material a bit different.
Now there also the Multiply Add instructions, in short MADD instructions to work with.
In plain English MADD means that the vector graphic will be recalculated to it's precise position, and the instruction always sort of double checks before we get output, that's why we have throw in the 2 value in the end calculation.
So, what we have here is this.
52 ALU ops * 4 floats (vector4s) * 550 (clockspeed) * 2 (MADD) =228.8
Gflops for the RSX and Cell as a team.
If we do the same with the specs of Xbox 360 we will find that it does the following, all the numbers provided through the same calculation though with the Xeon
im just clearing things up which people seem no to understand that sony is again overhyping, but this time theyve done well to hide it.and its just a matter of time before it gets released.
First a bit on my background.
I have done an education for computer sciences with a major in 3D graphics development, and I am now working for my PhD.
Since this is so, I have worked quite a bit with hardware in terms of programming and graphics creation
Let me warn all of you, sony is overhyping it's product once again, like they have done before.
And I am amazed to see how biased several of the webpages and magazines are.
They all try to downsize Xeon and Xenon technology, but with the arguments and testcases that most of these sources come up with , Cell and RSX will often come out way worse, yet that's a thing they do not show us of course.
Many people don't seem to grasp that ATI's Xenon truly is a revolution in terms of pipeline architecture.
Unlike the RSX the Xenon is truly next gen,
Xenon revolutionizes powermanagement within it's core, so it doesn't need all the mhz's to create a massive output.
The unified shader architecture also gives developers way more playground, and the Xbox 360 will certainly be able to incorperate more ways of instruction for creating and rendering the graphics on screen.
The RSX on the other hand will have it's massive clockspeed, but it will use it in a less efficient way.
Anyway, with the specs of both consoles now fully released it is possible to do a REAL TIME comparinson of the 2 consoles,your about to see what most of the sony representetives didnt want you to see.
Comparing these two GPU's is like comparing Apples to Banana's.
RSX on paper will have certain advantages over Xenon, and Xenon will have certain advantages over RSX.
There is the element of co-operation with the CPU we also have to consider.
Ok, lets put up the specs for the RSX as published.
- 550 Mhz
- 51 billion dot products/sec count's for total system performance
- 300 Million Transistors
- 136 shader operations per clock
good now that's for the facts as presented to us, we have 550 MHz of power to work with
The Cell and the RSX together are capable to produce 51 billion dot products.
I think it is interesting to take a closer look at this claim especially, since I worked with this bit while the specs of both consoles first became public, the important thing is that mnay people just compare the seperate peices of each console to PS fanboys and PS3 no-it-alls it will be music to there ears, but to us who know about comoputers and know how to compare them,ill tell you one thing, sony has lost alot of its credibility ;).
Anyway.
Since the Cell will have 7 DSP's all being able to do a dot product per cycle, we have some numbers to work with, we can put the numbers in a small calculation.
7DSP * 3.2(ghz) = 22.4 billion dot products/sec for the CPU
since we had 51 billion in total , we will have to substract them to know what is left for the GPU.
51 - 22.4 = 28.6 Billion dot products
When you devide this number to the clockspeed of the GPU you will get 52 ALU operations per clock as they are called.
Now as stated before, the RSX's architecture is not that different from the GeForce 6800 and so it will use Vector4 standards.
Since ATI's architecture is done with Vector5s it will handle the material a bit different.
Now there also the Multiply Add instructions, in short MADD instructions to work with.
In plain English MADD means that the vector graphic will be recalculated to it's precise position, and the instruction always sort of double checks before we get output, that's why we have throw in the 2 value in the end calculation.
So, what we have here is this.
52 ALU ops * 4 floats (vector4s) * 550 (clockspeed) * 2 (MADD) =228.8
Gflops for the RSX and Cell as a team.
If we do the same with the specs of Xbox 360 we will find that it does the following, all the numbers provided through the same calculation though with the Xeon
|
by Dan 'the man' (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
Can't wait for those 5 minute loading times. It's going to be great!
|
by JOSE (Unregistered) - 2006-09-23 |
|
|
» SHORT
nocomment
nocomment
|
by Mentality - 2006-09-24 |
|
|
13 - Sony Leak
M$ F**K Buddy!!!!
|
by Mentality - 2006-09-24 |
|
|
Who the f**k even asked about all that s**t? No-one, this is the psp section for starters, not the xbox or PS3 section, go shove that information up your a**, get someone to rip off your head, then take a s**t down your own kneck.
|
by . (Unregistered) - 2006-09-25 |
|
|
» .
that screenshot looks like dude a is rooting dood b
that screenshot looks like dude a is rooting dood b
Featured Content
QJ.NET Blog Network  |
|
| MyQJ | Feed / PDA |
| MyQJ | RSS / PDA |
| Blog of Blogs | Feed / PDA |
| QJ.NET | RSS / PDA |
| Gaming Consoles | Feed / PDA |
| Nintendo DS | RSS / PDA |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS / PDA |
| PSP Updates | RSS / PDA |
| Wii | RSS / PDA |
| Xbox 360 | RSS / PDA |
| PC Gaming | Feed / PDA |
| Age of Conan | RSS / PDA |
| Games for Windows | RSS / PDA |
| MMORPG | RSS / PDA |
| Tabula Rasa | RSS / PDA |
| World of Warcraft | RSS / PDA |
| Science | Feed / PDA |
| Science | RSS / PDA |
| Technology | Feed / PDA |
| Apple | RSS / PDA |
| Gadgets | RSS / PDA |
| iPhone | RSS / PDA |
| Mobile | RSS / PDA |
| Photography | RSS / PDA |
| Tech | RSS / PDA |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - September
| Most Commented | |
| (142) | |
| (45) | |
| (40) | |
| (34) | |
| (30) | |
| (20) | |
| (18) | |
| (17) | |
| (16) | |
| (16) | |
| (14) | |
| (14) | |
| (13) | |
| (13) | |
| (11) | |
| (10) | |
| (10) | |
| (9) | |
| (9) | |
| (8) | |
User Favorites - September
Accessories
(591)Add-ons
(86)Applications
(171)Artwork
(53)Batteries
(18)Cheats
(60)Deals
(233)Events
(78)Firmware
(279)Flash Applications
(20)Flash games
(33)Game Demos
(27)Games
(4365)Hacks & Exploits
(353)Homebrew Applications
(3910)Homebrew Demos
(66)Homebrew Development
(712)Homebrew Emulators
(981)Homebrew Games
(2054)Homebrew Themes
(18)How-To
(219)Humor
(45)Imports
(215)Interviews
(490)Magazines
(309)Mods
(191)MY QJ
(12)News
(5744)Off Topic
(513)Opinions & Analysis
(345)Podcasts
(24)Previews
(1661)PSP Slim & Lite
(121)Reviews
(111)Rumors
(373)Scans
(92)Screenshots
(538)Site News
(162)UMD Movies
(172)Videos
(1337)Wi-Fi
(200)
Emulators
Amiga 500
(28)Amstrad CPC
(25)Apple II
(1)Atari
(61)BBC Micro computer
(8)Capcom Play System 1
(24)Capcom Play System 2
(31)Chip 8
(9)ColecoVision
(18)Commodore 64
(18)DosBox
(11)Gameboy & Gameboy Color
(90)Gameboy Advance
(49)HitBit
(8)HP48
(9)Intellivision
(9)J2ME
(1)Macintosh
(9)MAME
(23)MGT Sam Coupé
(7)MSX
(50)Neo Geo
(105)Nintendo 64
(106)Nintendo NES
(60)Odyssey
(1)PC-8801
(6)PC-9801
(7)PlayStation
(26)PSP
(11)ScummVM
(18)Sega Gamegear & Master System
(35)Sega Genesis Megadrive
(50)Super Nintendo SNES
(85)Tandy Color Computer/ Dragon
(1)Thomson MO5
(3)Thomson T07-70
(7)TI-92
(6)TI-99
(3)Turbo Grafx 16 & PC Engine
(37)Vectrex
(4)Virtual Boy
(0)Wonderswan
(30)X86
(1)ZX Spectrum
(7)ZX81 Sinclair
(6)
Titles
Archives
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
