|
|
|
|
Permalink |
Email this |
Linking Blogs
| Digg It!
Bookmark / Find this article on: |
|
19 Comments
|
Maybe they're working on an original title for the PSP instead of a remake. I'm all for that.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!
TELL ME THEY'RE LYING JUST TO UNDO THE LEAK!!!
THAT GAME WOULD BE MY LIFE!!!
woah.
O__O;;
¬_¬ maybe you should check in that new "gaming detox" place.
not a fan of Tomb Raider, but it indeed looked good.
tomb raider seiries sucked any way why do people care so much... i mean you play a stereotype barbie girl running around killing wolfs... If you really want to see what those girls do go to high school and you can watch them put on make up and talk about bra sizes i swear you wont seem them jumping around in caves
Too bad... I would have bought it.
SCi, reconsider. The first two TR were the best, and by utilizing the PSP, many new demographics and audiences will be able to tap into the goodness that once was.
omgwtfbbq!11111eleven
nooooos core plzzzzzzi beg u plz plz plbz no core!!!!!1111
my life is now pointless !!! i had dreams of aniversiry adition!eleven!!!oneoneone!!!eleven1one
plz core release beta release!!! plz core email me beta release ok???!!!!!!! plz k thxbye
core plz add me on MSN also:
coolbilly@ultimate-pokemon-masters.org
if u dont add me in 24hrs ill rape my little sister and kill myself. k thnxagain core, plz k ok bye! cu
This looked so far along, I don't know why they wouldn't have just finished it if they had already invested in the manhours to make it.
oh and I hate unregistered n00b comments...
haha this is hilarious
oh yes
that's too bad, the game really had a lot of potentional :(
Hey, I would have bought it.
this is a let down, i would have bought that game, instead i just won't buy any other core games.
they've just made another *****-up like they did with angel of darkness.
I for one would have most deffinatly bought that game !!!!!
I hope with enought uproar that they will reconsider!!!!!!
"Core is alive and well..." - who gives a crap, id rather have tr anniversary over core's existance any day...
sci stopped the game most likely due to core's involvement... every decision they make turns into complete rubbish these days (especially in terms of the tr games), which is why the tr franchise was stripped from them, and given to crystal dynamics... sci knows that core will screw this up (questionable as to if they'll screw it up WORSE than the tr legends port got messed up, though...)
so yeah... sucks that this game was cancelled, but lets all know that it was obviously all cores fault, and not sci, for their decision to save their franchise/characters from these idiots.
Firstly, these "idiots" created the Tomb Raider-franchise in the first place.
Secondly, these games are already made and known to be good, they are just updating the gfx-engine (and probably adding bits here and there).
This is SCi all the way, just thinking income. They probably figure (almost) nobody's gonna by it as these games are already out on all platforms under the sky, as stand-alone and various compilations...
Just look at the video, how "messed up" do you think that game looks? Looks bloody brilliant to me...
Hasn't this been cancelled because they can just release the originals on the PS1 emulator later in the year?
Firstly, these "idiots" created the Tomb Raider-franchise in the first place.
true, im not taking away that the first game was incredibly good. but EVERY tr game since then by them has grown steadily WORSE. all the GOOD creative elements within core that worked on the tr franchise have long since gone, leaving only the people who are ill equipt to handle the tomb raider games... unless your going to tell me angel of darkness was a classic...
___________
-- Secondly, these games are already made and known to be good, they are just updating the gfx-engine (and probably adding bits here and there).
known to be good? what the hell are you on about... besides the original, they all stunk (tr2 was passable, but not a great game...) - the tr franchise only became good again when it was taken AWAY from core.
___________
-- This is SCi all the way, just thinking income. They probably figure (almost) nobody's gonna by it as these games are already out on all platforms under the sky, as stand-alone and various compilations...
when companies think 'income', their general move is to flog a franchise for all its worth, releasing whatever they can... if money was their only goal, they'd release it. most likely they got cold feet because of core's current track record with tr games, and decided that after the brilliant come back of tr legends, they didnt want core to UNDO ALL THAT EFFORT.
___________
-- Just look at the video, how "messed up" do you think that game looks? Looks bloody brilliant to me...
you can NEVER tell how a game is going to be from a developer produced demo! a demo is created to wow people, not give them an accurate idea of how the game will be, you should know that by now.
start playing some games (especially tomb raider games) before you come in and try to back up the company that almost managed to completely destroy the tomb raider franchise.
The core that is today, is NOT the creative force that gave us the original game.
They are ill equiped to make this psp game. hopefully sci will shop around for another developer and give it to them, or even hand it over to crystal dynamics, unless the original game story is somehow tied up with core...
Core Design weren't exactly given the freedom and the time to innvoate and improve the TR games were they? After TR1 was a massive success Eidos basically insisted on annual updates to the franchise which basically gave Core enough time to make some new levels each year.
Lara's creator Toby Gard left because he was frustrated with the way Eidos were marketing the character.
When Core were finally given the chance to make a new Tomb Raider engine for the next generation it took them a long time. And they weren't even allowed to finish it, Eidos basically rushed it to market because they needed to make their 1st quarter financials look good because they don't have any other decent franchises.
When Angel Of Darkness flopped it was Core who got blamed and the game was given to a different dev house. Just shows you how much control Core ever really had over the franchise (i.e. none).
While TR:Legend was excellent, it wasn't exactly long and it did basically steal Prince of Persia's design didn't it? It's not Core's fault they lost TR, it's Eidos'.
There is avery good chance they cancelled it ONLY because it failed to live up to the quality of LEGEND. And if that is the case then why bother release an inferior version of Tomb Raider after Legend just breathed life back into the franchise.
There is a good chance that "Anniversary Edition" will still see the light of day with the Legend engine and not produced by CORE.
http://psp.advancedmn.com/article.php?artid=3109
Tomb Raider 10th Anniversary Confirmed
June 16, 2006
by: Matt Furtado
Eidos has announced '10th Anniversary Edition' of Tomb Raider for the PSP. First details inside.
Eidos confirmed today that they are developing a special 10th Anniversary Edition of Tomb Raider.
The new game is being developed by Crystal Dynamics, who recently launched Lara Croft Tomb Raider: Legend on Xbox 360, PS2, Xbox, PC and PSP, with versions on Nintendo DS, GBA and GameCube later in 2006.
"10th Anniversary Edition of Tomb Raider, is a one-off title to celebrate both Lara and Tomb Raider, it will appeal not only to the loyal fans of the Tomb Raider series but will also attract a totally new audience." Said Larry Sparks, Head of Brands Management at Eidos.
Tomb Raider originally launched in 1996 and is still one of the best selling videogame franchises of all time, with over 30 million copies sold.
The special 10th Anniversary Edition of Tomb Raider will be available on PlayStation 2, PSP and PC.
|
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
| Most Commented | |
| (140) | |
| (57) | |
| (43) | |
| (31) | |
| (25) | |
| (24) | |
| (22) | |
| (19) | |
| (17) | |
| (17) | |
| (16) | |
| (15) | |
| (14) | |
| (13) | |
| (12) | |
| (12) | |
| (10) | |
| (10) | |
| (10) | |
| (10) | |
Accessories
(615)Add-ons
(87)Applications
(176)Artwork
(81)Batteries
(18)Cheats
(63)Deals
(264)Events
(160)Firmware
(338)Flash Applications
(20)Flash games
(33)Game Demos
(34)Games
(5893)Hacks & Exploits
(443)Homebrew Applications
(4698)Homebrew Demos
(73)Homebrew Development
(892)Homebrew Emulators
(1175)Homebrew Games
(2408)Homebrew Themes
(18)How-To
(222)Humor
(51)Imports
(231)Interviews
(629)Magazines
(310)Mods
(211)MY QJ
(14)News
(7636)Off Topic
(603)On Shelves This Week
(30)Opinions & Analysis
(479)Podcasts
(25)Previews
(1669)PSP Go
(92)PSP Minis
(7)PSP Slim & Lite
(124)QJ How-To Series
(11)QuickJump QuickGuide
(18)QuickJump QuickPeek
(36)Reviews
(114)Rumors
(492)Scans
(170)Screenshots
(704)Site News
(174)UMD Movies
(180)Videos
(1730)Weekend Warrior
(72)Wi-Fi
(203)
Emulators
Amiga 500
(29)Amstrad CPC
(28)Apple II
(1)Atari
(64)BBC Micro computer
(8)Capcom Play System 1
(36)Capcom Play System 2
(42)Chip 8
(9)ColecoVision
(21)Commodore 64
(20)DosBox
(11)Gameboy & Gameboy Color
(91)Gameboy Advance
(64)HitBit
(8)HP48
(9)Intellivision
(9)J2ME
(3)Macintosh
(9)MAME
(23)MGT Sam Coupé
(7)MSX
(52)Neo Geo
(116)Nintendo 64
(128)Nintendo NES
(60)Odyssey
(1)PC-8801
(6)PC-9801
(7)PlayStation
(26)PSP
(46)ScummVM
(21)Sega Gamegear & Master System
(37)Sega Genesis Megadrive
(52)Super Nintendo SNES
(87)Tandy Color Computer/ Dragon
(1)Thomson MO5
(4)Thomson T07-70
(8)TI-92
(7)TI-99
(3)Turbo Grafx 16 & PC Engine
(54)Vectrex
(4)Virtual Boy
(0)Wonderswan
(30)X86
(1)ZX Spectrum
(10)ZX81 Sinclair
(7)
Titles
Archives
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005


